Wichita water main break today11/26/2023 Upon inspection they discovered that water was coming up quite fast through the street, escaping through expansion joints between the curbing and the street, flooding William Street, and crossing over the curbing onto the sidewalk. when they noticed water running in the gutter in front of Sutton Place, an office building located on the southeast corner of Market and William Streets in downtown *302 Wichita. Fiant were proceeding north on Market Street shortly before 8:30 a.m. On June 23, 1974, district fire chief James Schauner and his driver James L. The plaintiffs contend the trial court erred (1) by refusing to instruct the jury on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, (2) by refusing to instruct the jury on the theory of strict liability, and (3) by refusing to grant the plaintiffs a new trial on the basis of juror misconduct. This is an appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the defendant City of Wichita, returned in an action for damages sustained as a result of a broken water main. Hernandez, of Woodard, Blaylock, Hernandez, Pilgreen & Roth, of Wichita, and McDonald, Tinker, Skaer, Quinn & Herrington, of Wichita, for the appellee.īefore FOTH, C.J., SPENCER and SWINEHART, JJ. Coombs, of Coombs, Chartered, of Wichita, for the appellant Russell Duckworth, D.D.S. Kitch, of Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, of Wichita, for the appellants Sutton Place, Ltd., and Vic's Place.Ĭhristopher Standlee and Eugene G. Petition for review denied January 23, 1981. THE CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, A Municipal Corporation, Appellee. ARNOLD, d/b/a VIC'S PLACE, A Partnership, and DR. ARNOLD ASSOCIATES, INC., for and on Behalf of SUTTON PLACE, LTD., A Limited Partnership, and V.N.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |